When John F. Kennedy (JFK) first entered the public stage, his personality was political wildfire. But, to this day, baby boomers still consider Kennedy a presidential shining star.
We don’t remember JFK as an ill man. Most people remember him as one of America’s most well-liked presidents. After their terms are over, nearly all presidents become more popular, regardless of whether they were liked or disliked during their political career. The public reconstructs them as historical icons, placing their legacies on a pedestal in our collective memory. The lines between personal and political are blurred, but that’s just politics. Sadly, we are losing the ability to distinguish between endearing personality and good politics.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC), one of today’s most prominent progressive leaders, also has mass personal appeal. She’s not exactly on the same latitude as JFK, but by defeating Joe Crowley – once one of the most powerful Democrats in Congress – she is hailed as a new voice among the Democrats. She is fodder for outrage: Right-wingers hate her and liberals are enthused by her. Much like how we glaze over JFK’s regal celebrity, we excuse AOC for establishment pandering.
She, like all media-happy young celebrities, attended the Met Gala. She wore a white dress with “Tax the rich” printed in red.
The Met Gala is a frivolous monstrosity of a cultural institution that blandly regurgitates haphazard fashion trends. It’s a ridiculous circus of tasteless celebrity culture that is gutting what little artistic intuition still exists. If you’re rich and famous and you want to show it off, you attend the Met Gala.
There is absolutely nothing socialist about the Met Gala.
So, why would an alleged socialist attend?
I found it hard to care about AOC’s stunt, but there’s more to be said about her crafty facade. My criticism of AOC is not a personal one. I will not give in to the partisan mudslinging that brandishes AOC as an arbiter of liberal evil or a left-wing white knight. Out of her proposed legislation, 21 bills have passed, most of which are symbolic measures which renamed buildings and established ceremonious holidays for historical figures. Her crown jewel, the Green New Deal, was shot down and mocked by then-Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell after he slated the bill to a lethal vote on the Senate floor.
To be fair, it’s hard to manage a progressive agenda when your party nominates a conservative who benefits from the fossil fuel industry to spearhead its climate action plan. But we can’t forget that AOC elected Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House and fiercely campaigned for Joe Biden. Ironically, she labeled her endorsement of Biden as “tactical,” which is exactly her function.
With AOC, the Democrats can blatantly overlook the failure of their anti-poverty programs and cut millions from unemployment insurance. Sadly, personality is more powerful than policy.
The icing on the cake: AOC voted “present” on a bill providing funding to Israel’s Iron Dome. Then, she cried. In a moment where she could’ve protested America’s unnecessary involvement in foreign affairs, she decided to be complicit.
AOC is a tool to secure genuine left-wing support to uphold the weak Biden coalition. She is all smoke and mirrors. Instead of sheepishly idolizing our politicians, we should examine them for what they are. AOC is not our saving grace. She is a cog in the political machine she claims to fight against.
We want politicians who create change, not ones who cry at the opportunity to act.
[email protected] • Jun 25, 2022 at 1:14 pm
"This is because Spaniards are uniquely placed firmly in both the Hispanic and white American ethnoracial categories, as the singular European national group that is denoted on census forms as Hispanic by virtue of originating the language and culture the panethnic term alludes to (Calderon 1992; Mora 2014; Padilla 1984)."
"Panethnicity is a political neologism used to group various ethnic groups together based on their related cultural origins; geographic, linguistic, religious, or ‘racial’ (i.e. phenotypic) similarities are often used alone or in combination to draw panethnic boundaries."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panethnicity
Alexandra Ocasio Cortez is definitely not an individual I trust. The boundaries that have been drawn in Europe must be clarified again for Americans and Hispanics and Latinos alike.
There is definitely a tactical play on the ignorance of people who are not thoroughly aware of their history and their heritage.
Many Hispanics, especially the one’s that are not black view themselves through the lens of the Spaniard. This is how blacks are exploited and mistreated, and craftily taken advantage of. This is what makes for colorism and racism; which is wide-spread and not thoroughly addressed and accounted for amongst white Hispanics and Latinos.
It is clear, that through her personal decision making; that her interests lean towards the Spaniards, Spain, that began the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade, and Colonized or basically exterminated the indigenous people of South America of their culture to the degree that they have no strong recollection of the habits and behaviors that comprise their original culture. Indigenous American Indians were disempowered and robbed of their culture, which was then forcibly replaced with Spanish influence from Spain. The Spaniards along with the Portuguese pioneered the Transatlantic Slave Trade.
It is important to understand that Spaniards are as a result, DENOTED as, not referred to as, or honorably regarded as Hispanic, in order to draw the boundaries that marked the end of the Transatlantic Slave and Spanish Conquest. To denote something is to mark it in a negative way and very important break down and understand the meaning of the word. This is how the term Hispanic is defined; as a denotation. It’s very similar to the same principle when we use the demote instead of promote.
I think Alexandra Ocasio Cortez would have done better to prioritize, support and strengthen the American Indian aspect of her heritage if she is truly advocating for the underprivileged and the voiceless. Europeans are anything but underprivileged and voiceless. Her decision making can be regarded to as a slap in the face to our European ancestry and the progress we want to make on humanity as a whole.
She is not someone that is well informed, and if she is then I view her behaviors as pure wickedness.
Thanks for being brave enough to post this post. I am not a Republican and I don’t think you are either. I’m thankful for the Hofstra University platform used to address such issues. I hope that I was clear in writing position and that whomever reads that can understand what I mean as a way to create change in our society.