In opinion columns, in her latest book “How to Fight Anti-Semitism” and while promoting the book on The Brian Lehrer Show on the radio, New York Times opinion editor Bari Weiss makes false equivalencies as she argues that waves of anti-Semitism are sweeping through the United States and Western Europe. For Weiss, everything from neo-Nazi marches, to boycotts by opponents of Israeli settlements on the West Bank, to street crimes against religious Jews, to hurtful comments by college students are evidence that Jews are under attack.
While a student at Columbia University in 2004, Weiss co-founded a group called Columbians for Academic Freedom that charged professors who were intimidating students in their classes who made pro-Israel comments. The New York Civil Liberties Union investigated the charges and concluded that it was Weiss’ group, not university faculty members, that were the threat to academic freedom.
In response to a Monday, Sept. 8, 2019, New York Times column “To Fight Anti-Semitism, Be a Proud Jew,” I submitted a response that the Times chose not to print:
Like Bari Weiss, I consider myself a proud Jew who recognizes the need to combat anti-Semitism. However, I think she makes a serious mistake by conflating two different phenomena. Right-wing white nationalism abetted by the Trump administration is a grave threat to Jews and to democracy in the United States and must be vigorously challenged. Urban tension in gentrifying communities where racial and ethnic minorities are being displaced by gentrification and in Brooklyn, New York, by an expanding orthodox religious group has led to anti-Semitic slurs and physical assaults on religious Jews, but they are not an attack on Judaism as a religion and on the Jewish people as a whole. This behavior can best be addressed by building an inclusive community.
Hofstra University recently was embroiled in what is a national campaign by the AMCHA Initiative to identify colleges and universities it suspects of anti-Semitism because professors and student groups challenge the Israeli occupation or because of student complaints that other students expressed bias toward them because they are Jews. The website claims that it is monitoring 450 campuses where over 2,500 “incidents” have occurred since 2015.
A Hofstra entry was updated on Sept. 12, 2019 because of an opinion essay printed on the front page of The Hofstra Chronicle where a student who self-identified as an Orthodox Jew charged that “anti-Semitism is alive and more insidious than I had expected” on the Hofstra campus. The author cited a series of microaggressions by what she considered to be insensitive students and non-supportive faculty and administrators and called on the Hofstra community to “confront this issue now to curb the rise of anti-Semitism, before it’s too late.”
I don’t dispute the student’s feelings, but I disagree with her accusations of anti-Semitism on the Hofstra campus. As a teacher, I distinguish between bias and racism or anti-Semitism. Everyone has biases. They are products of culture, what we are taught and our understanding of experiences. But everyone does not act on biases to restrict or hurt other people. Biases can be examined based on evidence and new experiences and be dismissed, or at least controlled. Racism and anti-Semitism belong in a separate category. Racism and anti-Semitism mean acting on biases and even promoting biases to justify discrimination against and exploitation of groups of people to achieve economic, political or social advantages. It can be a slippery slope from bias to racism when groups are pitted against each other for political power or scarce resources, but the transition is not inevitable.
People can overcome bias and challenge racism and anti-Semitism. Examples are alliances that built the American labor movement in the 1930s, strong support by many whites for the abolition of slavery and the 1950s African American Civil Rights movement, as well as the election of Barack Obama as president of the United States. Distinguishing between bias and racism or anti-Semitism makes it possible to have thoughtful and respectful discussions and societal debates on difficult issues without automatically putting people on the defensive.
Microaggressions and insensitivity are hurtful, but everything does not rise to the level of racism and anti-Semitism. Everything is not the same.
Alan Singer is a professor of Teaching, Learning and Technology and the director of social studies education programs.
[email protected] • Sep 30, 2019 at 4:18 pm
The best thing about this article is that it proposes a way forward, a better way to communicate and coexist. That’s the conversation we need to be having.
Anonymous • Sep 30, 2019 at 4:37 am
I’m so sick of far leftist Jews using their voice to excuse all anti-semitism that doesn’t benefit their political agendas. A black man called a Jewish man a dirty Jews and smashed his face with a brick for daring to stand up to him. Alan is quick not excuse this but to actually blame the Jewish man for daring to exist in Brooklyn, which Alan somehow sees as the native land of African Americans. Alan says "gentrification" is to blame, without knowing how long each of these men had lived in the area and says the orthodox community can avoid being attacked by being more inclusive of their attackers. Shouldn’t Alan be more inclusive of the Klan or neo-Nazis? Doesn’t Alan want to avoid being attacked by them? Practice what you preach Alan.
According to Alan "Racism and anti-Semitism mean acting on biases and even promoting biases to justify discrimination against and exploitation of groups of people to achieve economic, political or social advantages." I’d love for Alan to publish another op-ed explaining how somebody calling him a "dirty Jew," knocking out his two front teeth, and breaking his nose with a brick would not be consider anti-Semitism. Perhaps if Alan wasn’t comfortably behind his keyboard and had some skin in the game, or rather peeled off with a brick by a man trying to kill him for his Jewishness he wouldn’t feel so apologetic.
I also have a hard time believing that Alan would consider it a "micro-aggression" for a professor to ask their class whether Hitler was "truly evil" nor would he believe students espousing the view that ‘Hitler could not be considered evil as he did what he believed was right’ were simply guilty of the same micro-aggressions. Historians will attest to the fact that Hitler most certainly believed in what he was doing so by this logic, Hitler was not an evil man. Personally I find this thought process disgusting and open anti-semitism so I wonder why Alan excuses this rhetoric about the Tree of Life shooter? He was a white supremacist after all. Does Alan simply see this as a liberal thought exercise? Is he trying to protect the liberal mindset of modern college campuses and the professors who indoctrinate their students in it?
And lastly I ask Alan to explain how he knows the incidence asking students to imagine a world without Jews was no anti-semitic in it’s nature. No I don’t know the exact context but Alan doesn’t claim to either so for him to dismiss it as sensitivity is unfair and baseless. A professor should know better than this.
"People can overcome bias and challenge racism and anti-Semitism" – yes they can Alan, when will you? Being a Jew doesn’t give you a pass or the right to put other Jews in danger and exuse the hatred they face.
[email protected] • Sep 27, 2019 at 2:15 am
According to Alan Singer, Jews being attacked in Brooklyn is not the attackers’ fault. It’s the fault of "an expanding orthodox religious group." In other words, Singer is blaming the Jews for the attacks they’re suffering. We’ve heard this all before numerous times in countless places over the past 2000 years or so. Singer is parsing hatred in order to excuse violent anti-Semitism. The hate will continue as long as people like Singer rise to excuse it.
[email protected] • Sep 25, 2019 at 11:40 am
What utter nonsense this article is. Nice touch there describing the alleged "occupation". Your anti-semitism is loud and clear. You say that racism and antisemitism have been overcome before and yet cite two racial instances such as the election of Barack Obama and the abolition of slavery.
When, Prof. Singer, will the anti-Jewish dragon be slayed? Where is that example? And why deny that the dragon still breathes fire when an Orthodox man is attacked in Brooklyn? It is no wonder Jewish students are passing on Hofstra for Muhlenberg and SUNY Binghamton where they feel safer. If you can’t provide support for the feelings of ALL students, including Jewish ones, then resign since you are essentially telling Jewish students to suck it up instead of acknowledging and solving the problem. Imagine if a person of color claimed racism – would you tell that person "everything is not the same"? You have no business being a professor. I wonder who would build an alliance with you?
[email protected] • Sep 24, 2019 at 5:26 pm
How horrible it is that when a Jew in Brooklyn is attacked, they may think that it’s due to antisemitism. It’s a good thing that Professor Singer at Hofstra out on Long Island knows better than these victims in Brooklyn, and that he’s not afraid to let them know this.