As of Nov. 10, there have been 307 mass shootings in 2018. To put that into perspective, it is the 314th day of the year. So, essentially, nearly each day of the year could have a corresponding mass shooting. The most recent of these tragic events occurred late Wednesday night, when a 28-year-old Caucasian man entered a local line-dancing bar in Thousand Oaks, California, and murdered 12 people with a Glock .45 Caliber handgun. This shooting comes two and a half weeks after the Pittsburgh Synagogue shooting, in which 11 worshippers were murdered by a 54-year-old Caucasian male using an AR-15 assault rifle.
Mass shootings have become so common in this country that you’re now more likely to die in a mass shooting than a natural disaster. Yes, seriously. Did you know that you have a 1 in 60,000 chance of dying in a tornado? A 1 in 130,000 chance of dying in an earthquake? A 1 in 161,831 chance of dying from being struck by lightning? A 1 in 66,324 chance of dying in a cataclysmic storm? Meanwhile, you have a 1 in 11,125 chance of dying in a mass shooting. We all know what to do or have been forewarned about things like earthquakes, tornadoes, lightning and storms. We know where to go, how to act, how to be prepared. There are emergency warnings that are broadcast nationwide on television and our phones, endless reporting and even actual weather channels describing events, and not to mention countless films about natural disasters – it’s something everyone talks about. They’re something that everyone is warned about and everyone expects. But you’re more likely to die in a mass shooting.
Gun control, for some reason, still remains a controversial topic in the United States. What people refuse to acknowledge is that it’s become an epidemic. Because people can’t feel safe going to concerts (Las Vegas), can’t feel safe going to movies (Denver), can’t feel safe going to work (YouTube, California, Capital Gazette, etc.), can’t feel safe going to schools (Parkland, Virginia Tech, Columbine, etc.), can’t feel safe going to bars (Pulse, Thousand Oaks) and can’t even feel safe going to religious services (Pittsburgh, Sutherland Springs). Yes, I understand people argue that the Second Amendment, which states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed,” is untouchable and indispensable, but last time I checked, the country that boasts the largest army in the world no longer has any need to form a “well regulated militia.” As well as this – have we forgotten what “amend” even means? Change.
Our reality is that we face a new mass shooting almost every single day of the calendar year. This is our new norm. Great Britain had a school shooting in 1996. After that, they outlawed handguns. There hasn’t been a school shooting there in 20 years. That’s longer than I’ve been alive. That’s longer than any high school student has been alive. Mass shootings have become so commonplace in our society that they barely last a full 24-hour news cycle. People see it, they report it, they send thoughts and prayers and then it’s on to the next. That’s not normal! One of the people murdered at the Thousand Oaks Shooting was someone who had survived last year’s Las Vegas Massacre. His name is Brendan Kelly. He survived one tragedy just to die in another.
These tragedies keep occurring day after day and nothing’s happening. Nothing is happening because people care more about a law written over 200 years ago than the thousands of innocent lives lost each year. Excluding suicides, at least 15,549 people died gun-related deaths in 2017. As well as this, there were over 31,157 gun-related injuries in that same year. That’s 15,549 people that could still be alive. Most of who had futures and families and loved ones and plans and lives. And thanks to an outdated amendment, they’re gone. Maybe one of these victims would have been able to motivate or galvanize this country to make a real change. At this point, it’s hard to imagine who or what can be the catalyst for this change. Maybe it’s me. Maybe it’s you. All I know is that we need change, and we need it now.
[email protected] • Nov 18, 2018 at 1:29 am
Ah to be young, naive and with no understanding of Constitutional rights.
[email protected] • Nov 14, 2018 at 1:33 pm
As of Nov. 14, 2018, there have been more than 50 million babies killed by abortion since Roe v Wade in 1973. To put that in perspective, that would mean 1.1 million babies/year murdered with their mother’s permission. That’s 3013 lives/day or 125 lives/hr.
[email protected] • Nov 14, 2018 at 12:27 am
The Bill of Rights was created to protect the rights of Americans from a government that would enforce its own will on the people. It’s an insurance policy against tyranny. Each of those first ten amendments was designed specifically to limit the government’s power so that the people could hold the government in check. Cars kill more people than guns bit there is no outrage for banning cars. You love big government which the founding fathers abhorred- see England.
Never see mass shootings at guns shows, why is that? All that ammo, guns and loopholes. Because everyone else has guns that’s why. You actually hate freedom and choice and start with guns. The way colleges limit discussions and conservative points of view the 1st amendment is next
[email protected] • Nov 13, 2018 at 10:56 pm
Over 29 thousand Americans die in mass shootings per year, huh? It’s more like 20, sweetheart. LOL
[email protected] • Nov 13, 2018 at 10:56 pm
only people who want others to give up there guns are so uneducated on everything,. cell phones kill 20 times more people in the states then guns,. so is everyone going to turn in there cell phone,. hmmmm cars , yup no more driving,. actually 2nd says we should have what the government has to protect ourselves from them,. especially the nut ball left,
[email protected] • Nov 13, 2018 at 10:04 pm
Ms. Levine, Please go find and watch the Penn and Teller video that explains the 2nd amendment. I don’t think you understand it. The militia is one thing and the right of the people to bear arms is another. Checks and balances. They explain it in full.
[email protected] • Nov 13, 2018 at 7:57 pm
I completely agree with this editorial.
Guns owners are disrespectful of authority. A failure to rely on authorities is an invariable sign of improper and overly independent attitudes. The mere fact that they gather together to talk about guns at gun shops, gun shows, shooting ranges, and on the internet means that they have some plot going against us normal people. A gun owner has no right to associate with another gun owner.
Therefore, to help ensure our right to happiness and safety we must ban and seize all guns from private hands, and forbid NRA-based criticism towards people who are only trying to help. Searching the homes of all NRA members for any guns and pro-gun literature will go a long way towards reducing crime.
Common sense requires only uniformed soldiers, police, and other agents of the state have access to firearms, and think of all the money we can save by just taking away the guns from private owners and giving them to the military and police. No person should be able to challenge this by writing to Congress or the President. If they do they should be forced in court to admit to it and then fined a hundred million dollars for each time. Subjecting them to torture will probably change their minds.
Making it mandatory that church ministers preach against guns or else they can’t get licensed will certainly encourage the church folk to have the correct belief about guns.
We should hold a nation-wide vote against guns but gun-owners cannot be allowed to participate. They are too biased.
People who don’t like all this prove they are on the side of the killers with the guns and should be put in jail along side all the gangbangers and other gun nuts. Letting them sit in jail for a few years before they are charged will give the government plenty of time to find something wrong in their lives. Anything they say, write, or express should be held against them to prove their guilt.
We should bring all of them here to Chicago to be tried by Mayor Rahmfather as judge, and we should allow only mothers who have lost children to gunfire to be on the juries. Any attorney who tries to defend them should be arrested also. If we don’t get the right verdict the first time we can just keep trying them until we do.
No woman needs to protect herself from rape, assault or murder and should just leave crime prevention to the Police who are properly equipped to investigate following the crime’s completion. Women using a gun in self-defense interferes with and makes the attempted crime a "non-event," which unnecessarily complicates the Police investigation. Any woman who does this should be put in jail for interfering with an investigation.
If someone still really, really thinks they have a need for a gun in their home for protection then the Army should just force them to host and feed some armed soldiers.
Those who claim that the 2nd amendment was given to us because we might someday need guns to use against an oppressive government forget that our Constitution has strong internal safeguards to protect our freedoms. So there!
Long live our Constitution!
[email protected] • Nov 13, 2018 at 9:18 pm
Long live the Constitution? Are you kidding?
I won’t touch the Second Amendment here; saying that you’d like to see church leaders mandated in what they should say, and declaring that they should not be ‘licensed’ if they don’t toe the party line is a complete negation of the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause.
Not to mention the idea that no dissenting opinions are allowed the populace, and that they should be jailed for their words.
And tortured.
Really?
[email protected] • Nov 13, 2018 at 10:20 pm
If we are to abolish the 2nd amendment, we might as well go all the way. That’s the point of JBs comment.
[email protected] • Nov 14, 2018 at 12:11 am
I thought it might be thus, but my comment took it straight.