Last Friday morning, Hofstra students received an alarming email blast. It was only three sentences long, but if anything, the brevity only contributed to the shock. In case you’re one of those people who never checks their school email (and if so, how do you live like that?), here’s the full text:
“It has been reported to Public Safety that a residential student was assaulted in their room by someone they had recently met. Please be careful about inviting people you don’t know well to your residence hall room. Call Public Safety immediately at 516-463-6789 if you or someone you know needs assistance and follow all guest policies as outlined in the Guide to Pride and Living Factor.”
There’s a lot to unpack here. First of all, the subject line of the headline was “Hofstra University Safety Alert,” which could mean anything from an inclement weather warning to an active shooter warning. Opening an email like this, which begins with a mention of an assault with no prior warning, could potentially be triggering to survivors of sexual assault, especially on-campus sexual assault. According to the Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network, 11.2 percent of graduate and undergraduate students experience rape or sexual assault through physical force, violence or incapacitation. This means that roughly 1,247 graduate and undergraduate students at Hofstra could be victims, and these statistics likely only include reported incidents.
Additionally, it’s unclear as to whether or not this student consented to this email being sent. Even if the student is anonymous, it could be an upsetting experience to have your story of sexual assault sent out to the entire school. This surely cannot be the protocol for every sexual assault that is reported to Public Safety.
What makes this one unique enough so that an email blast was necessary? Not providing a warning when discussing sexual assault on campus is a massive oversight and is hugely insensitive to this survivor and all survivors on campus.
Then there’s that second sentence, which is the real kicker. First of all, what is Public Safety doing to apprehend the perpetrator, if anything? Second of all, if a student reports an assault, the appropriate response is not to basically blame the student for inviting someone into their room, even if that’s someone they just met. And it’s especially inappropriate to do so in an email blast.
That’s an incredibly humiliating position to be in, and an additional source of stress that this student surely does not need. Also, and this should go without saying, assault and rape are never the victim’s fault. That’s Advocacy for Survivors 101, and the fact that Hofstra failed that speaks volumes. Telling me with a patronizing “please” not to invite strangers into my room does not make me feel safe – quite the opposite, actually.
Yes, Hofstra is getting better with addressing issues of sexual assault. Starting next semester, Hofstra’s Title IX administration will be coordinating with a student advisory board, who will provide a more direct line of student insight into policies and their implementation. But if this email is any indicator, Hofstra has a long, long way to go before this campus can be considered a truly safe space, not just for survivors, but for all of us.
The views and opinions expressed in the Editorial section are those of the authors of the articles. They are not an endorsement of the views of The Chronicle or its staff. The Chronicle does not discriminate based on the opinions of the authors. The Chronicle reserves the right to not publish any piece that does not meet our editorial standards.
Timothy • May 2, 2018 at 11:57 pm
You opened your article by quoting the full text of the email. You then complained that the email had no trigger warning for those that may be upset by knowledge that such an assault had taken place. Yet, you yourself offered no warning that you were about to address a sensitive topic before you recited the email in full. So if trigger warnings are a concern, why are you not using them?
[email protected] • May 3, 2018 at 1:51 pm
You know, out of all the comments on this thread this was the most constructive. You’re completely right, I should have provided a warning and I failed to, and that’s pretty hypocritical of me. I’m going to edit this piece to provide one. Thank you!
[email protected] • May 2, 2018 at 4:33 pm
If you are so fragile that words in an email cause panic – an email trying to prevent actual physical harm versus imagined slights – you might not be ready for the real world. Check yourself into a psychiatric facility and work on getting healthy.
[email protected] • May 2, 2018 at 2:40 pm
You are just looking for something to be outraged over. Your complaints here are child-like and whiney. You are why people are getting so sick of this leftist idea that everyone is a victim. Wake up and join the real world, sweety.
[email protected] • May 2, 2018 at 7:21 am
Yeah. And then there’s all of those warnings about sexual assault, rape culture, and male students who are still breathing. TRIGGERED.
[email protected] • May 1, 2018 at 11:41 pm
Your right. There is a lot to unpack about your analysis of the public safety email. First, trigger warnings usefulness are doubtful and may prevent particularly vulnerable persons from getting information they need to protect themselves. Second, the email was sufficiently vague to protect the identity of anyone involved in the assault. No permission needed. If the perpetrator has not been identified or apprehended, which appears likely, Public Safety is just taking an extra step to let everyone on campus know that someone with proven bad intentions is in the area. Third, when you are conducting an investigation into a crime you do not disclose relevant information nor do you publicize what you are doing to identify or apprehend the offender. That is just giving the bad person a heads up as to how close you are to catching him/her. Third, reminding people to take common sense measures (i.e. don’t invite someone you are unfamiliar with into your dorm room) to protect themselves is both necessary and prudent. Obviously, if you find it "patronizing" you can choose to ignore the advice. However, it does not mean the advice is inappropriate nor ineffective. It is interesting that you as an outspoken advocate against violence towards women, would instead rather protect the sensitivities and anonymity of survivors rather than possibly prevent future attacks that result in additional victims. Public Safety appears to be doing its job and is trying its best to prevent future attacks while respecting the privacy of victims. I find your editorial contradictory and unhelpful to this mission.
[email protected] • May 1, 2018 at 9:12 pm
This person’s mother should have swallowed her…